|
|
SAFETY CAMERA OPERATIONAL
COSTS 2005-2006
|
ORGANISATION |
VALUE £ |
POLICE COSTS
|
|
Police Costs Subtotal |
£1,025,988 |
PROJECT OFFICE
COSTS
|
|
Magistrates Costs Subtotal |
£47,887 |
MAGISTRATES COSTS
|
|
Magistrates Costs Subtotal |
£100,738 |
ALL HIGHWAY
AUTHORITY COSTS
|
|
Highway Costs Subtotal |
£189,481 |
OVERALL
OPERATIONAL COSTS
|
£1,364,094 |
Lincolnshire Road
Safety Partnership - Safety Camera Fine
Revenue 2004/05
|
Collected Fixed
Penalty Notices
|
29,252 |
Actual value of
Fine Income received
|
£1,755,120 |
SAFETY CAMERA OPERATIONAL COSTS 2004-2005
|
| ORGANISATION |
VALUE £ |
POLICE COSTS
|
|
Capital Costs |
£370,730 |
|
Revenue Costs |
£604,605 |
|
Police Costs Subtotal |
£975,335 |
|
|
MAGISTRATES COSTS
|
|
Capital Costs |
n/a |
|
Revenue Costs |
£88,238 |
|
Magistrates Costs Subtotal |
£88,238 |
|
|
ALL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY
COSTS
|
|
Capital Costs |
£291,294 |
|
Revenue Costs |
£189,973 |
|
Highway Costs Subtotal |
£481,267 |
|
|
|
OVERALL OPERATIONAL
COSTS |
£1,639,843 |
|
|
Lincolnshire Road Safety Partnership -
Safety Camera Fine Revenue 2004/05
|
|
Collected Fixed Penalty Notices |
27,447 |
|
Actual value of
Fine Income received (FPN's x £60) |
£1,646,820 |
|
|
|
Query |
2000/2001 |
2001/2002 |
2002/2003 |
2003/2004 |
2004/2005 |
|
What is the
change in KSI
Casualties at camera
sites? |
-72% |
-8% |
-33% |
-54% |
-60% |
|
What is the Personal
Injury Collision change at camera sites?
|
-30% |
-33% |
-33% |
-31% |
-38% |
|
Number of fixed penalties paid |
15,675
|
26,492
|
26,222 |
23,717 |
27,447 |
|
Annual operating costs |
£512,721.00 |
£516,818.00 |
£1,137,625.00 |
£1,225,007.00 |
£1,639,843.00 |
|
How much was retained by Central Government
through HM Treasury? |
£114,279.00 |
£542,862.00 |
£435,695.00 |
£198,013.00 |
£6977.00 |
TEMPORARY/CONCERN SITES
- What are they?
Temporary Safety Camera sites are
locations that do not meet all the criteria for
a fixed camera but are specific areas that the
partnership are undertaking speed camera
enforcement for reasons that may include:
1. Public Concerm - when the local community
requests that the partnership enforce at a
particular site because high traffic speeds are
causing concern for road safety e.g. speeding
outside schools.
2. Collision Frequency - when a
site has a high number of personal injury
collisions (PIC) but an insufficient number of
killed or seriously injured (KSI) collisions to
meet the criteria for a fixed site.
3. Engineering - when roads do
not meet the minimum engineering requirements.
- Factors taken into account when
selecting a concern site:
Whilst assessing the viability of
a temporary site the LRSP will analyse and take
into consideration the following factors:
-
Average speed of motorists
-
85th% speed of vehicles
-
Percentage of vehicles
exceeding the speed limit
-
Volume of traffic
-
Number of collisions and
injuries
-
Proximity to schools
Assessment of these factors acts
as guidance only and should not be considered as
rules for site selection.
- Enforcement at concern sites:
Lincolnshire's
mobile camera unit is deployed to each temporary
site for four hours of every month. All sites
are monitored on a monthly basis and reviewed
every three months.
- Concern Sites in
Lincolnshire:
-
A15 - Aslacky to Morton
-
A15 - Bracebridge Heath
-
A1500 - Stow Park
-
A17 - Asgarby
-
A46 - Middle Rasen
-
A52 – Kirton Holme
-
A52 - Wainfleet Toft
-
B1166 - Shepeau Stow
-
B1192 - Langrick
-
B1195 - Great Steeping
-
B1200 - Saltfleetby
-
B1397 - Sutterton
-
Belton Lane, Grantham
-
Caistor Road - Market Rasen
-
Eastwood Road, Boston
-
Eaudykes Road, Friskney
-
Fodderdyke Bank, Midville
-
Greatford Road, Uffington
-
Harrowby Lane, Grantham
-
Hawthorn Road, Lincoln
-
Horncastle Road, Boston
-
Humberston Road, Tetney
-
Hykeham Road, Lincoln
-
Longleys Road, Lincoln
-
Mill Lane, Theddlethorpe
-
Rawsons Lane, Boston
-
Seas End Road, Moulton Seas End
-
Spalding Common, Spalding
-
Station Road, Tyddgate
-
Sturton by Stow Village
|
|
|
